Tag: Litigation Technology

Litigation Technology

How To Use A Laser Pointer (and more)

Nine Mile Corner

SO WHAT IS A LASER POINTER?

A laser pointer or laser pen is a small handheld device with a power source (usually a battery) and a laser diode emitting a very narrow coherent low-powered laser beam of visible light, intended to be used to highlight something of interest by illuminating it with a small bright spot of colored light. Power is restricted in most jurisdictions not to exceed 5 mW.   The first laser pointer was built in 1960 by Hughes Aircraft.  The first laser pointers were released in the early 1980s.

HOW TO USE A LASER POINTER…

If your attorney has a need to point out relevant issues in the courtroom either during trial or during their closing argument, they may have a need for using a laser pointer.  Here are some detailed and complete instructions for using a laser pointer:

  1. Find a test area on the floor or on the wall to test the laser pointer.  Do NOT point the laser pointer at a person or aircraft.
  2. Press the button on the laser pointer to activate the laser.
  3. Locate the laser dot in the direction you are pointing.
  4. Draw attention to the subject matter with the laser dot by circling objects instead of pointing.
  5. Release the button to turn off the laser.

NOTES: 

  • Do not use a laser pointer on a flat screen monitor.  Most monitors will not reflect the laser dot thus making it ineffective.
  • Be aware that the laser beam doesn’t end.  Some beams can travel up to 22 miles.

TOP TEN LASER POINTERS (Cost)laser

  1. 3D G301 Green Laser Pointer ($16)
  2. Kensington Presenter Expert ($50)
  3. LaserPointerPro 30mW Purple Laser Pointer ($25)
  4. Logitech Wireless Presenter R400 ($25)
  5. Orion SkyLine Deluxe ($50)
  6. Quartet Green Laser Pointer ($34)
  7. Quartet Slimline ($15)
  8. Quarton Infiniter 2000 Green Beam Pointer ($40)
  9. Wicked S3 Arctic Laser ($400)
  10. Z-Bolt BTE-4S Red Laser Pointer ($28)

WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A RED OR GREEN LASER POINTER?  DOES IT MATTER?

Green can be used inside or out, but green is much more visible outside.  But for courtroom purposes it really doesn’t matter; however, studies show that our eyes see green better than any other colors.  In my experience, people are generally more at ease looking at a green laser dot which is helpful if you are presenting something to a jury.

 

 

 

 

Advertisements
Litigation Technology

Sidelined Litigation Support Specialist

 

sidelinedI am currently sidelined by my employer during the Government shutdown.  I have been deemed to be “non-excepted” which means they think I am not essential during the shutdown.  I really don’t know how to take that.  Although my co-workers who were tagged as being essential are still working without pay, I am not comfortable with being put on the sideline until the politicians can decide on funding the wall.  I don’t like this situation one bit.

So I am doing odd jobs and chores around the house to keep busy until I get back in.

I have to reflect on this because I do become essential when an attorney needs a video clip or help with playing a file.  Don’t tell me that I am “non-excepted” because I can assure you that I certainly become essential when they need something or help with an eDiscovery issue.  I don’t know how they are managing those issues right now.  Unfortunately, I am prohibited from helping.   I suppose they are getting it done without me.

On the other hand, this may be a good thing.  Maybe they will see exactly what I contribute to the mission on a daily basis.  No, I’m not saying I am the most important person there but I am a team player and I do my part and I’m damn good at it.  I have always taken pride in doing it and I want to be back doing it again.  I’m completely frustrated that I am being forced to sit out because of some political tug-of-war.

Right now instead of managing data, complex databases issues or assisting the legal support staff with discovery or trial issues, I am trying to figure out how I am going to pay my bills and what I need to do to manage my budget while my paycheck is on hold.  I would rather be dealing with a discovery issue than my household budget.  I am confronting another stress that I hadn’t seen coming.  I had projects that I had planned to work on now but I’m on the sideline.

Since 1996, I have been involved in litigation support duties for my employer.  I have sat in the “hot seat” of hundreds of trials over the years.  I have been the ringmaster of technology in the courtroom while assisting the legal team in presenting documents, photos, audio and video in the courtroom.  The technology has changed so much over the time I have been doing this.  While I first started, we had VHS tapes for video and audio cassette tapes for audio recordings.  Today, the audio and video comes through in a variety of formats and software programs.  Instead of easier, in many ways it has become more complex.  If you ask any of the attorneys I have assisted in those trials, they would all tell you that I was very much essential.  I wouldn’t be on the sideline like I am right now.

I have been through other shutdowns, furloughs and delayed paychecks.  The last time I was also sent home but then when the workload was too much, I suddenly became essential and was asked to go in to handle it.

While the news only reports that the Government shutdown is causing trash to be out of control in the national parks, they ignore the hundreds of thousands or government workers who are forced to the sideline because they are not considered to be essential.  Not much is said about that.  Many of us would rather be back to work AND getting paid for it.   Since I am not the employee who is not able to pick up the trash at a national park, most people won’t know or care that I am not able to do my job.  It doesn’t matter to me what other people think.  I know and that’s all that matters to me.

I don’t know how long I will be on the furlough bench.  It doesn’t look too promising that I will be back in the game anytime soon.  I can assure you that I will be ready when the call comes and whether or not my employer considers me essential or not I will get the job done as I always have throughout my career.

 

 

Litigation Technology

A Pain In My CODEC

A colleague recently asked me:  “Do you have problems in your office with third-party video files?”

I answered with a resounding:  “Yes!  They are the #1 pain in my CODEC!”

Video technology has changed since I started in litigation support.  In those days it was easy.  You had a VHS tape and you digitized it (convert into an electronic format).  Today, those VHS tapes are collecting dust in old case files while today we are under siege from digital file formats.  They come from many sources such as convenience store surveillance cameras, undercover recordings, bank videos, etc.  Unfortunately, many of these videos can only be played using proprietary players or some other form of player.  It is a huge headache and I am expected to figure it out.

Here are some common issues with video files today:

  1. Wrong CODEC.  Okay, what exactly is a “CODEC”?   The computer nerd definition is:  a device or computer program for encoding or decoding a digital data stream or signal.   So for normal people this is a video that won’t play because the player doesn’t have the file needed to play it.  For instance, if someone says “I can play it fine on my computer” but when you play the same file you encounter an error message, it usually means you are missing a CODEC.  So you have to find that little rascal somewhere but how do you know exactly what CODEC is missing?  One program that I have found useful is called GSpot.  Yes, go ahead and get your high school giggles out of the way but this is for real.  GSpot is a free Windows-based program that can identify the codecs used in video files it can also check to see what’s missing.   Click here to download GSpot. gspot
  2. Proprietary Video Players.  Most of me and my colleagues frequently have attorneys or their support staff drop a disc or flash drive on us and ask us to make it work or that they don’t know how to play it.  I have done this job long enough to find the executable file (.exe) and click around the program to figure out.  The first thing I look for is a way to export the file to a common format such as .mpg, .wmv or .avi.  If that option isn’t evident, I will click on the “about” menu and Google the software version I have.  Sometimes I have been able to locate a user guide or a software add-on that will help with exporting files.  When none of that works, I give it back to the source and tell them they need to provide some instructions on how to play the video files.  Yeah, they never like this last resort answer.
  3. AVIs are from the devil.  AVI files have to be handled very delicately.  They are wild and very unreliable.  I have found that TrialDirector doesn’t handle them very well, especially if you make clips and want to export the clips.  Forget that.  AVI stands for Audio/Video Interleaved and contains both audio and video together in a playable format.  (Insert chuckle here)  If you have a choice, export to any other format than AVI.  They are great when they work but they are too much of a wildcard.
  4. How is the jury going to play the videos?  This is something I preach to our legal staff.  You HAVE to think ahead to the jury room and think about how are they going to play the videos.  Are you going to gamble that someone on the jury will be tech savvy enough to be able to play them?  This is why it is so vitally important to do everything possible to export third-party video files to a common video format.  It doesn’t matter if I can figure out how to use the proprietary video software, I can’t be in the jury room.

Another issue with playing video files is actually playing them even if they are in a common format.  Windows Media Player is the common player on Windows PCs but you can also download the VLC player which can sometimes play video files that Windows Media Player cannot.  VLC is a free and open source cross-platform multimedia player that plays most multimedia files and various streaming protocols.  Click here to download it.  Going back to the subject of those nasty missing codecs, VLC has a wide variety of codecs.  Click here to view the various codecs available in the VLC player.  The VLC player also has place where you can get information about the codec.VLC

If you have a problem with opening video files with Windows Media Player and are unsure about the codecs available on your Windows Media Player, click on TOOLs menu > OPTIONS > PLAYER tab > select Download codecs automatically check box > click OK.

There are other codec apps available but be sure to check them first and verify they are safe to download.

 

 

 

Litigation Technology

Why I Like Credit Card Style Flash Drives

TBI_Flash Drive ExampleFlash drives, thumb drives, jump drives or whatever you want to call them are now more common in our work than ever before.  Just as VHS tapes have almost disappeared from existence, flash drives are doing the same for discs.  Personally I would like nothing better than to get out of the CD/DVD business.  Although flash drive technology has become more convenient in storing and transporting large amounts of data, it has also been susceptible to security breaches.  Unprotected data on a flash drive can be dangerous in our business.  Because of their size, it is too easily for someone to walk out the door either intentional or unintentional with sensitive data.

Flash drives are still expensive depending on the size you need so not only do we have to be concerned about security but also we must be able to maintain costs.  To maintain costs, you want to be able to recover flash drives.  Honestly though, how many flash drives do we really get back?  While it should just be a way of transporting data, it has become more of another means of storage.  So, my dilemma has been:  how can you increase the success on having flash drives returned?

The solution literally fell into my lap one day at the office.

I was working with one of our paralegals who handed me an envelope for data that needed to be offloaded.  When I took the envelope, a credit card fell into my lap.  I picked it up and it had the name of the agency on it.  I didn’t recognize it immediately to be a flash drive.  I found the tab on the card and rotated it to reveal the USB connector.  Once I offloaded the data, I knew that I had to return the flash drive because the name of the agency was on the card.

Using the credit card style flash drives has many advantages.  First, you can easily identify the source of the flash drive and increase the chances it will be returned.  I see it much like when we would travel in Georgia when I was growing up and stopping at a gas station to use the rest room.  I remember the gas station attendant having the bathroom keys attached to large blocks of wood or some other object to remind you to return the key.  The credit card style flash drives have that same kind of accountability without attaching it to a cement block.  Of course this doesn’t give you a 100% guarantee that the flash drive will be returned but I think it makes the odds much better.

The next thing I like about this style is that it is credit card size.  It can easily be mailed or slipped into a file without the unnecessary bulk of most flash drives.

The only negative I can think of about using the credit card style flash drive is that because of the card part of the drive, it could make it difficult for users to plug it into the USB connection on the PC depending on where the user’s PC is located.  I don’t see this as a huge issue since you can always get a USB cable extension or – move the PC.

The vehicle for our data is constantly changing.  When I first began my career in litigation support we were still working with 3.5″ diskettes and VHS tapes.  If there is one constant about our career field is that it is constantly changing.  It is one of our challenges to make it as efficient as we can for our legal staff to transport the data we receive every day.

For more information, checkout this version from Flashcoast.

Litigation Technology

Discovery and Mac Users

Mac1I have dealt with issues lately with opposing counsel asking that I convert electronic discovery into a format for their Macs.  I won’t tell you what I REALLY said but I have always been very rigid about turning over data to opposing counsel in the way we have received it.  This issue with law firms having Macs and discovery defies common sense.  Let’s say it like this….if we were turning over paper that was in Chinese, would we be responsible for translating those documents?  Heck no.  No one would trust the other side for translating it for them.

Another thing about these Mac-only firms.  That can’t be an excuse.  Just go out and buy a Windows laptop.  Goodness sakes people.

So what are we – as litigation technology specialists – supposed to do with this?

As far as Electronically Stored Information (ESI) goes, the U.S. Courts have an ESI protocol which states:

b.  ESI received from third parties should be produced in the format(s) it was received or in a reasonably usable format(s).  ESI from the government’s or defendant’s business records should be produced in the format(s) in which it was maintained or in a reasonably usable format(s).

d. When producing ESI discovery, a party should not be required to take on substantial additional processing or format conversion costs and burdens beyond what the party has already done or would do for its own case preparation or discovery production.  For example, the producing party need not convert ESI from one format to another or undertake additional processing of ESI beyond what is required to satisfy its legal disclosure obligations.

Always check with your local courts regarding their policy on how to handle ESI.  Personally, I wouldn’t want to convert discovery for opposing counsel in fears that it would alter the data in some way or that something would be corrupted in the conversion process.  It just doesn’t make sense to do it.  Of course, if someone asks for a single file or two and they understand the process, I would do it but not entire volumes of discovery.

We are not responsible for the operating systems chosen by each individual opposing counsel.  It’s just silly that because they don’t have the compatible system with which to run certain applications that we should do anything to the data.  I’m sure most reasonable people can see the potential problems of catering to those who have Macs or any other forms of computer operating systems.

In today’s world, most Windows-based software have a Mac version which can be downloaded and installed.  There are times when this isn’t the case, especially when working with surveillance videos and third-party software.  I had an issue once when a company using their own proprietary software was not compatible with Macs.  The opposing counsel in this case simply went to Staples and purchased a Windows laptop.

Sure, there are some problems with Macs opening some executable files and other Windows-compatible programs.  Honestly, there have been many times I have received data which could not be accessed on our computer so I just purchased what was needed to open it.  Nothing difficult about that.  For instance, many times we have received QuickBooks files and we do not have the software so I just had to go through the process of getting it.  Not much you can do about that.  I couldn’t stop and just say we can’t open it.  Yeah, I don’t see that working out for me.

Another way to resolve Mac issue is to make the discovery available for review.  Set up an office or conference room with a Windows PC and let the opposing counsel know they can spend the day at your office reviewing the discovery.  You will find that they will usually opt to purchase a Windows laptop.

I have found that some Mac users are very adamant about their Macs although they are seriously outnumbered in the computer world.  It’s almost an offense to them if you don’t have Mac-friendly data.  Okay, well, let’s slide back over into the REAL world now.  Windows still rules whether we like it or not.  That’s just the way it is.  With the volumes of electronic data we deal with on a daily basis, we simply have to use the tools to get the job done.

 

 

Litigation Technology

How To Compare Videos In PowerPoint

videos_ppt

This week I was presented with an issue were my attorney wanted to compare versions of the same video.  He wanted to see if there were any differences.  You know, most of us do not have a Hollywood movie studio to use for these situations.  I pondered on this task and considered using TrialDirector first.  While you can play videos in different zones in TrialDirector’s Presentation mode, there is no way I could find to play them in synch at the same time.  I also tried a couple of video editors (Corel VideoStudio Pro and Camtasia) which I normally use to make clips.  Finally, I wondered about doing them in PowerPoint and discovered this was my answer for this project.  Here’s how I did it:

  1. Open PowerPoint
  2. Click on New Slide > Two Content
  3. In the left frame, insert your first video.
  4. In the right frame, insert your second video.
  5. Select each video and go to the Video Tools ribbon > Playback > change to start Automatically.
  6. Click on Animations > click on Play > select “With Previous” for Start for each video
  7. Test it by starting your slide show.  (Slide Show > From current slide)

To my surprise it worked and we were able to compare videos to find the inconsistencies.

 

Litigation Technology

Relativity: How to create a saved search

relativity

Let’s be honest – Relativity can be a bear sometimes.  User friendly?  Not so much.  Useful to manage large amounts of data?  Absolutely.

One of the things I have learned about Relativity that is helpful is how to create saved searches.  Saved searches are very useful when you run a search and don’t want to have to run it again each time you need it.  It is also helpful if you have other users also reviewing the database.

 

When you open your workspace to the database, click on the main documents folder:

R1

Next, click on the magnifying glass at the bottom to create a new search:

R2

Click on new search:

R3

Name the search:

R4

Go to Conditions and select the ISSUES field:

R5

Next, for operator, use any of these:

R6

Click on the ellipses button …

R7

Select the issue such as “Hot Docs”

R8

Click ADD button

R11

Your issue “Hot Docs” will move to Selected Items.  Select it.

R12

Click on SET button

R13

If you need to share with other in your review group, change the owner at the top to Public

R9

Click on Save and Search

R10

Relativity will now conduct your search and save it under the name you selected.

Since saved searches are executed in real-time, you save the search definition but not the results.  Relativity executes the search each time you click on it in the Saved Searches browser and when you return to it after performing other tasks in the workspace.  This ensures that only data meeting the search criteria is returned in the search results.